This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/15882] Check for return type of overloaded operator new too early
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jun 2004 21:22:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/15882] Check for return type of overloaded operator new too early
- References: <20040608204054.15882.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-06-08 21:22 -------
Hm, I see. The sentence in the standard sounds like an oversight, though: even if the
return type and first argument are 'as specified above', I can still do so while using
template arguments, as shown in the example program, and I believe that this would
be a useful thing. Besides, the standard talks about 'template parameter types' when
it could also be 'template parameter values'.
Would something like this justify a DR? Gaby, Jason, you are more experience in
these matters than I am. Would you mind commenting?
Thanks
Wolfgang
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15882