This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/14928] [gfortran] minval intrinsic does not understand mask
- From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 4 Jun 2004 22:40:43 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/14928] [gfortran] minval intrinsic does not understand mask
- References: <20040412204218.14928.schnetter@aei.mpg.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2004-06-04 22:40 -------
Subject: Re: [gfortran] minval intrinsic does not understand
mask
schnetter at uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From schnetter at uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-06-04 08:03 -------
> Section 13.2, "Arguments to intrinsic procedures" of the same draft, specifies
> that "the valid forms of reference for procedures with optional arguments are
> described in 12.4.1". 12.4.1 in turn describes "normal" (non-intrinsic)
> procedure calls, where the "name=" syntax is not compulsory.
While I see a way to bend the words to support the position that the
"MASK=" keyword is mandatory, I agree with your reading. I've just
ported over the changes in g95 to support this and will submit them for
review tomorrow.
- Tobi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14928