This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/14639] [3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Incorrect emission of unused compiler-generated destructor at -O2
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jun 2004 23:38:07 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14639] [3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Incorrect emission of unused compiler-generated destructor at -O2
- References: <20040318204634.14639.austern@apple.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-06-03 23:38 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Incorrect emission
of unused compiler-generated destructor at -O2
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-03 23:35 -------
> Here is the patch for 3.5.0 after Zack's patch:
> Index: method.c
> ===============================================================
> ====
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/method.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.283
> diff -u -p -r1.283 method.c
> --- method.c 24 May 2004 21:07:42 -0000 1.283
> +++ method.c 3 Jun 2004 23:34:11 -0000
> @@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ use_thunk (tree thunk_fndecl, bool emit_
> this translation unit. */
> TREE_ADDRESSABLE (function) = 1;
> mark_used (function);
> - mark_decl_referenced (function);
> if (!emit_p)
> return;
>
> Should I apply this Jan/Mark?
If it passes tests, yes, please.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14639