This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/14671] [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
- From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 May 2004 07:54:08 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/14671] [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
- References: <20040321182857.14671.danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-05-27 07:54 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
On Thu, 27 May 2004, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-05-27 03:38 -------
> Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: int
>
> > The new regression caused by Dave backporting rth's patch on 04/24 is
> > unrelated and was detected by me only because I did a full regression
> > run on the POOMA tests with the (appearantly) fixed compiler.
>
> This assertion has not been proved. I've seen a number of bugs recently
> that were totally unrelated to the change that introduced them.
Well, it has, in so far as reverting the patch fixes the problem. Of
course the patch may just uncover a latent problem - but that still makes
rth (or the backporter) responsible of fixing the fallout.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14671