This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/15523] New: Can't have vectors of vector::const_iterator
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 May 2004 19:37:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/15523] New: Can't have vectors of vector::const_iterator
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
I definitely like the debug mode in libstdc++, but happened to fall over this:
-----------------
#include <vector>
int main ()
{
std::vector<std::vector<int>::const_iterator> x(2);
}
-----------------
When compiled with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC, I got this:
homes/csm2/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4.0/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.0/../../../../include/c++/3.4.0/debug/safe_iterator.h:125:
error: attempt to copy-construct an iterator from a singular iterator.
Objects involved in the operation:
iterator "this" @ 0x0x8067ee0 {
type =
N11__gnu_debug14_Safe_iteratorIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPKiN10__gnu_norm6vectorIiSaIiEEEEEN15__gnu_debug_def6vectorIiS7_EEEE
(constant iterator);
state = singular;
}
iterator "other" @ 0x0xbfffdd40 {
type =
N11__gnu_debug14_Safe_iteratorIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPKiN10__gnu_norm6vectorIiSaIiEEEEEN15__gnu_debug_def6vectorIiS7_EEEE
(constant iterator);
state = singular;
}
For some reason, I fail to see why I shouldn't be allowed to copy-construct from an
invalid iterator. After all, the result would still be invalid and couldn't be dereferenced, no?
I think this should be allowed.
W.
--
Summary: Can't have vectors of vector::const_iterator
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bangerth at dealii dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15523