This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct
- From: "zack at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Mar 2004 00:07:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct
- References: <20040305002353.14438.lindsayd@cisco.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-31 00:07 -------
I will need to study the code a bit to figure out whether checking in
_cpp_lex_direct is appropriate or not. Can't say when I will get to this,
but given what you say it is not critical. Reassigning to myself, retargeting
for 3.5.0, updating title and priority.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot |zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
|org |
Keywords|patch |
Known to fail|3.3.2 3.3.3 |
Known to work|3.3.1 |
Priority|P2 |P3
Summary|[3.5, needs investigation] -|Potential need for buffer
|E of #pragma has negative |overflow checks in
|line number |_cpp_lex_direct
Target Milestone|3.3.4 |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438