[Bug optimization/14749] [3.3 Regression] Miscompilation of bit test

["gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2004-03-27 02:09 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3 Regression] Miscompilation of bit test

"stevenb at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| On Saturday 27 March 2004 02:14, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
| > ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 
| > 2004-03-27 01:14 ------- Subject: Re:  Miscompilation of bit test
| >
| > "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| > | Confirmed, already by me on IRC.
| >
| > I'm sorry, I can't follow discussions on IRC (e.g. I'm just back from
| > office, reading through mails, approving patches, making a status
| > report before taking a flight to a conference in Europe in about 12
| > hours, and I don't expect to have regular connections there to be on
| > IRC).
| >
| > I would suggest that discussions by GCC developers that affect GCC be
| > held on GCC mailing lists.  Or at least, make an archive of those
| > discussions (even if that means some people would have tp refrain
| > from using some "words").
| 
| What discussion? What "words"?
| 
| I just pasted the test case into an IRC channel so that Andrew Pinski
| could confirm the bug.  I like this kind of direct communication, so
| if you don't mind, I'll keep doing things that way and post relevant
| information (ie. results from such "discussions") to gcc mailing lists
| and/or bugzilla.
| 
| I don't ask you to follow IRC, and you should not tell us not to use it.

Did you carefully read what I said, you would have noticed that I did
not ask you to stop using IRC.  Wouldn't you?

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14749