This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow
- From: "paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Mar 2004 14:17:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow
- References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-25 14:17 -------
Subject: Re: octave built under Cygwin very slow
Danny and Wolfgang,
Sorry but neither Ben or I are frequentees of your list so we did not
know. Hello Wolfgang!
I hope that Ben is in today, to get the version string to you.
As for the -fno-exceptions, what will happen if we do this, when...
"Octave is now using exceptions for error handling rather than
setjmp-longjmp. See libcruft/misc/quit.h for details. " (from Paul
Kienzle)? You can take a look at quit.h by going to
http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/OctaveClassReference/html/index.html and
looking it up in the file list.
If the build is going to fail, I do not think anybody should waste
their time trying since it is quite a long process.
Paul T
bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
>------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-25 13:43 -------
>Danny, this was exactly the feedback I was hoping for from you! :-)
>Let's wait what we find out about the version string and whether
>-fno-exceptions changes something. Is there a way to change the
>exception model short of recompiling everything?
>
>Thanks
> W. (= Wolfgang, but too tired of writing this out every time; and
> besides, everyone seems to know me on this list anyway :-)
>
>
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563