This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/14668] [3.4/3.5 Regression] declaration of `A*B::A' changes meaning of `A' from `class A'...
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Mar 2004 00:22:32 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14668] [3.4/3.5 Regression] declaration of `A*B::A' changes meaning of `A' from `class A'...
- References: <20040321130905.14668.pluto@ds14.agh.edu.pl>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-25 00:22 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] declaration of `A*B::A' changes meaning of `A' from `class A'...
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Hm, I may be blind today, but I fail to see what may be wrong with this
| code? (Clearly the initialization of the member has nothing to do with
| the problem here.)
Yes, I was not talking about the initialization.
| Gaby, do you refer to the "after declaration, reevaluate
| the declaration with the newly defined name and see whether it is still
| valid" rule?
Yes, that is the one I was referring to.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14668