[Bug optimization/14690] [3.4 regression] Miscompiled POOMA tests

["rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de  2004-03-23 14:44 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] Miscompiled POOMA
 tests

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:

>
> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-03-23 13:57 -------
> Some kind of testcase will be necessary, but it would be a great help
> if you could already try to sizzle it down a little bit. POOMA testcases
> are not really our favorites due to their size and complexity, and as
> you are well aware of, have frequently been sitting around a while until
> someone felt an urge to reduce them :-(

The ugl_test2 failure looks artificial, it's a likely broken testcase that
happened to work with earlier compilers.  It's a complicated inheritance
hierarchy and asserting on some default constructed data - maybe the
right/wrong method is selected.  I'm going to try to reduce this
somewhat.

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14690