This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/14663] [3.5 regression] bootstrap failure in libobjc (first .m file)
- From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Mar 2004 20:27:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/14663] [3.5 regression] bootstrap failure in libobjc (first .m file)
- References: <20040320143129.14663.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-20 20:27 -------
> From <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg01045.html>, it does not look like
> it is failing at all.
This run was done at D2004.03.18.20.58.00 (i.e., just before the Kenner
patch that caused other breakage because parts of the patch were missed).
The following run was done at D2004.03.19.14.19.00. This is just after
the last of the fixes applied by Kenner to his original fix:
2004-03-19 Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
* cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_unqualified_id): Use
TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_INDEX instead of TYPE_FIELDS.
* search.c (dfs_unuse_fields): Add two more TREE_CODES that mean
the field is named TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_INDEX.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg01046.html
There are a huge number of objc test fails in this test run.
At a somewhat latter time, we get the error compiling linking.m.
I haven't identified which change caused this regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663