This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/14545] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Cannot compile pooma-gcc (regression)
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Mar 2004 15:09:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14545] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Cannot compile pooma-gcc (regression)
- References: <20040312062911.14545.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-18 15:08 -------
Oh, hell. I was just posting this as an amusement for everyone, because
it is so _really_ short. How can we _not_ get this right?
This whole business with non-dependent initializers has run somehow
out of control given how late we are in the release cycle. We must have
had at least a dozen different reports about this problem. Has anyone
considered reverting the patch that introduced this instability? We seem
to be stomping out fires that keep popping up everywhere...
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14545