This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120
- From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Mar 2004 16:53:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120
- References: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-13 16:53 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in
3.5-tree-ssa 040120
dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at dberlin dot org 2004-03-13 16:00 -------
> Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120
>
>
>>and a lot more of int d farther away? Also, how are bb's marked? I see
>><bb 0>: but no more, and some gotos reference <bb 18> and <bb 16>
>>(with a label, too)?
>>
>>Can I get summaries somehow here? Or just dump one interesting
>>function rather than all of the program?
>>
>>Also, how do I dump some stuff about the PRE pass? Specifying
>>-fdump-tree-pre just dumps the trees after PRE with no information
>>about the PRE pass itself.
>
>
> -fdump-tree-pre-stats-details. But i already know what it is going to
> show in this case, based on the profile.
> I just need other properties of the functions, which i'm attempting to
> get.
I also see we're running PRE before DCE - the functions probably contain
a lot of dead code - would it be sensible and profitable to move the
first DCE pass before PRE? Can this be specified on the command line or
where would I need to change the source to do this?
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776