This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow


------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2004-03-13 08:06 -------
Subject: Re:  octave built under Cygwin very slow

I am not in a position to do so right now; the system that has Cygwin 
loaded on it is at work - I am 100% linux at home.  Unfortunately, I am 
out of town next week, so cannot get back to this until a week Monday. 
 I have cc'd this to Ben Diedrich in the hope that he can help you.

An obvious question, is what form would you like the test cases in?  The 
output from octave benchmarks or the octave binaries?  If it is the 
former, you will be able to get started on the octave mailing list:

http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/help-octave/2004/325
http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/help-octave/2004/337
http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/help-octave/2004/339    <--- 
contains configuration details
http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/help-octave/2004/389    <--- ditto

If you want the binaries, that will take a little longer....  It might 
be more practical, if you have the time, to build octave yourself.  We 
used octave-2.1.50 for our attempts to pin-point the problem because the 
"good" binary from octave-forge used this version.  However, 2.1.53 and 
2.1.56 both were slow when built with gcc-3.3.3

Ben, did you keep the deffective binaries?

Paul Thomas

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-13 07:24 -------
>Can you provide a testcase where 3.3.3 is slower than 3.2.3?
>
>  
>




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]