This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Mar 2004 23:39:51 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
- References: <20030729120327.11706.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 23:39 -------
Subject: Re: std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
|
| >| >The only fix that I should have applied is to make __cmath_power()
| >| >inline.
| >| >
| >| So, after all, Steven (#1) was right, why didn't you acknowldege that 6
| >| months ago?
| >
| >Because
| >
| > (1) some data was provided later, not before.
| >
| >
| The last data was provided December, 6th, three full months. Do you
| think free
| software implies slow feedback?
"slow" is in the eye of the beholder.
I donate my volunteer free time to GCC as much as I can. If you're in
hurry of papering over real problems, three months is "slow".
If you have squeezed schedule, three months look like three days.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11706