This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/14410] Bug with implementation of set for const iterators in g++ ...
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Mar 2004 09:04:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/14410] Bug with implementation of set for const iterators in g++ ...
- References: <20040303161106.14410.areza123@yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-05 09:04 -------
Subject: Re: Bug with implementation of set for const
iterators in g++ ...
Volker Reichelt wrote:
>Oops! Sorry for the confusion.
>But to prevent that from happening again, shouldn't we add a comment
>like "DR 103" to the typedefs of the iterators in question?
>
In this specific case, I agree. But it's something that must be decided
case by
case: we don't really want to add DR XXX for every DR that we implement
correctly, since many are trivial and/or have been always right.
Paolo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14410