This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/14230] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] ICE in cp_expr_size
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 1 Mar 2004 22:04:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14230] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] ICE in cp_expr_size
- References: <20040221001620.14230.jakub@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-03-01 22:04 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] ICE in cp_expr_size
Jason Merrill wrote:
>On 1 Mar 2004 20:37:48 -0000, "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Jason, this looks to be another problem with your exception-handling
>>optimization stuff. Would you please take a look at that?
>>
>>
>
>For the record, cp_expr_size is not related to the EH optimization code;
>aborts in cp_expr_size indicate places where the compiler would otherwise
>silently generate a bitwise copy of a class with a constructor.
>
>
>
Yes -- but I thought that the root cause in this case was the
exception-optimization code generating code that resulted in an extra
copy. Sorry if that was a bum steer!
>But yes, I'm looking at this and the other bugs you mentioned.
>
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14230