This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/10711] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in tree check: accessed elt 2 of tree_vec with 1 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:6707
- From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Feb 2004 20:02:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/10711] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in tree check: accessed elt 2 of tree_vec with 1 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:6707
- References: <20030509163601.10711.giovannibajo@libero.it>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-02-02 20:01 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in tree check: accessed elt 2 of tree_vec with 1 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:6707
gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
>> It's up to Gaby. The same patch can be backported to the 3.3 branch
>> as well.
>
> If you have a time to do a regression testing and the test shows no
> regression, I would be willing to accept it.
> (If that happens before 04h+00, it would be great :-)
Sorry, I was wrong, the patch can't be backported easily because
dependent_type_p did not exist on 3.3 (and we don't have two-stage lookup
anyway). So a different workaround should be found for this testcase, probably
checking one more error_mark_node somewhere.
Giovanni Bajo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10711