This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13847] Additions to the changes.html file for 3.4.
- From: "mattyt-bugzilla at tpg dot com dot au" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Jan 2004 14:34:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13847] Additions to the changes.html file for 3.4.
- References: <20040124154329.13847.mattyt-bugzilla@tpg.com.au>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mattyt-bugzilla at tpg dot com dot au 2004-01-26 14:34 -------
>> Need a "template <>" before templated static variable definitions.
> This is already documented in changes.html.
Template specialisations are documented, not static defines.
> Ok. I would just say that, in templates, all (modulo bugs) unqualified names
> are now looked up in at definition time.
Well qualified ones are as well, and that's new ...
> I didn't even know this was allowed before, must have been a GCC extension.
> OK, we can add a entry for this as well.
Actually, I believe this was the norm. See the C++ FAQ Lite for example, which
talks about explicit instantiations and uses no "class".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13847