This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants
- From: "rearnsha at arm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Jan 2004 09:26:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants
- References: <20031006200259.12527.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at arm dot com 2004-01-14 09:26 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error
on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants
>
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-14 09:18 -------
> What is also silly is that apparently an ARM maintainer thinks
> this is critical, yet according to this audit log no ARM maintainer
> has tried to solve this in the past three months. Richard, is
> anyone working on a fix for this? Should arm/unknown-elf.h
> default to another CPU?
>
I've been testing a patch since the weekend, once I had finally re-imaged
my netwinder with a version of Linux that could bootstrap C++ these days.
Yes it is critical for the release -- I don't believe that even
'secondary' platforms should not bootstrap 'out-of-the-box'.
R.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527