This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13005] Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Jan 2004 16:02:57 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13005] Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function
- References: <20031111075141.13005.stephenma@telus.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-10 16:02 -------
Subject: Re: Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function
"stephenma at telus dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| You can't impose mathematical rigor on the loosely-written ARM. If
| you try that, you end up concluding that the value of "1+1==2" is
| undefined, as far as the ARM is concerned.
No. There is a difference between both two situations.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13005