This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13005] Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Jan 2004 02:16:35 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13005] Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function
- References: <20031111075141.13005.stephenma@telus.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-10 02:16 -------
Subject: Re: Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function
"stephenma at telus dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| > As a matter of existing practrice, we don't say "see xxxx".
|
| Omitting the "see xxx" would do more harm than good. The g++
| maintainers would be flooded with questions about the warning.
|
| If you intend to be rigid about this, please tell me now. I would
| prefer to withdraw the patch rather than be blamed by people who do
| not understand what the warning means.
I don't mean to be ridig about it. I'm pointing out a fact and would
like that to be taken into account, when you will be submitting a
revised version.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13005