This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13351] [3.3 Regression] 10x slower generated code (GCC 3.3 compared with GCC 3.2)
- From: "cline at parashift dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Dec 2003 10:42:43 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13351] [3.3 Regression] 10x slower generated code (GCC 3.3 compared with GCC 3.2)
- References: <20031208072839.13351.cline@parashift.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From cline at parashift dot com 2003-12-08 10:42 -------
Subject: RE: [3.3 Regression] 10x slower execution speed GCC 3.3 (compared with GCC 3.2)
Sorry to bother, but the keyword you've added is incorrect: the issue is the
speed of the *generated* code, not the compilation itself.
10x slower is a bit extreme, so I hope you consider this to be a high
priority issue assuming you can confirm that its existence.
Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:43 AM
To: cline@parashift.com
Subject: [Bug c++/13351] [3.3 Regression] 10x slower execution speed GCC 3.3
(compared with GCC 3.2)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |compile-time-hog
Summary|10x slower execution speed |[3.3 Regression] 10x slower
|GCC 3.3 (compared with GCC |execution speed GCC 3.3
|3.2) |(compared with GCC 3.2)
Target Milestone|--- |3.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13351