This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/13271] Wrong code with -O2 optimization - 3.2 only - 3.2.2 OK
- From: "jrw at catena dot uk dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Dec 2003 16:24:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/13271] Wrong code with -O2 optimization - 3.2 only - 3.2.2 OK
- References: <20031202144956.13271.jrw@catena.uk.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From jrw at catena dot uk dot com 2003-12-02 16:24 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I understand, but we don't have enough resources to track down all the bugs
of
> all the previous releases which have been already fixed and discountinued,
just
> to make sure the bug is really fixed. We already have enough *certain* bugs.
> Moreover, the bug appears to be fixed in a later minor relase. In our policy,
> we are allowed to do ONLY regression bugfixes between minor releases. Thus,
> it's highly unlikely that an unrelated bugfix for an unrelated regression
might
> have hidden this bug.
> If the bug can't be reproduced in 3.2.2, 3.3, 3.4 or tree-ssa we can be
fairly
> certain that it's fixed.
> The best we can, if you *really* care about this code, is adding your
testcase
> to c-torture, to make sure it stays fixed forever.
Thanks for clarification and yes I appreciate this. I reported it because its a
code generation fault - I would not have reported anything less. However, the
problem itself is not important to me so there is no need for further action.
Thanks for your help.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13271