This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/12889] Fatal error while compiling on Compaq Tru64 UNIX
- From: "gnat-dev at buzco dot nyct dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Nov 2003 19:37:07 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12889] Fatal error while compiling on Compaq Tru64 UNIX
- References: <20031103185302.12889.vlako@bart.nl>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12889
------- Additional Comments From gnat-dev at buzco dot nyct dot net 2003-11-07 19:37 -------
Subject: Re: Fatal while compiling on Tru64
On 03-11-03 18:53:06, vlako at bart dot nl wrote:
| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12889
| Trying to compile gcc 3.3.2 source on a Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.1 (Rev. 732)
| (ALPHA MACHINE) with the Compaq C V6.3-025 on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.1 (Rev.
| 732) compiler (Compiler Driver V6.3-026 (sys) cc Driver).
| After doing a successfull configure, and while doing the make bootstrap, the
| following error occured:
| case "compare" in compare | compare-lean ) stage=2 ;; * ) stage=`echo compare
| | sed -e 's,^compare\([0-9][0-9]*\).*,\1,'` ;; esac; if [ -f .bad_compare ];
| then echo "Bootstrap comparison failure!"; cat .bad_compare; exit 1; else
| case "compare" in *-lean ) rm -rf stage$stage ;; *) ;; esac; true; fi
| Bootstrap comparison failure!
| fix-header.o differs
| *** Exit 1
| Stop.
| *** Exit 1
| Stop.
=== End quoted text ===
Have you tried doing a 4-stage bootstrap? I once had a similar problem
of one file not comparing after stage 3 and one more stage fixed it.
I think this has something to do w/ generated files doing something
funny when bootstrapping from certain compilers.
== Buz :)
--
Buz Cory of BuzCo Systems -- New York NY USA http://BuzCo.nyct.net
<gnat-dev at BuzCo dot nyct dot net> (Buz as GNAT Programmer)
write to <helpdesk at BuzCo dot nyct dot net> for FREE help with:
Getting started with the Ada Programming Language dot
Ada 95 is here! Why use an archaic, bug-prone language?