This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C99 structure initialization in gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.3.1

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at cox dot net>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:19:10 -0800
Subject: Re: C99 structure initialization in gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.3.1
References: <oPkqb.17597$PD2.7008@fed1read05>

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

With gcc-3.3.1, this works fine. With gcc-2.95.3, it complains about a "missing initializer for .value".

I tried your example with gcc-2.95, and it worked fine. Maybe you left something out of your bug report?

I did notice that if I added -W, I got a nice warning. But it was only a warning, not an error.

We stopped maintaining gcc-2.95 a long time ago, so if there is a problem, it isn't going to be fixed by us. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- C99 structure initialization in gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.3.1
  - From: Kevin P. Fleming

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]