This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/12771] Weak loop optimizer
- From: "tm at kloo dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Oct 2003 19:22:29 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/12771] Weak loop optimizer
- References: <20031025005408.12771.tm@kloo.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
------- Additional Comments From tm at kloo dot net 2003-10-28 19:21 -------
Subject: Re: Weak loop optimizer
On 28 Oct 2003, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
It's still an optimization weakness.
Toshi
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
>
>
> pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Severity|normal |enhancement
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
> Ever Confirmed| |1
> Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-10-28 15:38:57
> date| |
> Summary|Weak loop optimizer, |Weak loop optimizer
> |significant performance |
> |regression |
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-28 15:38 -------
> Since this is a regression from 2.7.2 which was released November 26, 1995 almost 8 years ago,
> we cannot really count this one as a regression as so much has changed since then.
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>