This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/12630] [3.4 regression] Various unrecognizable insns and ICEs at -O3
- From: "jh at suse dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Oct 2003 22:29:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/12630] [3.4 regression] Various unrecognizable insns and ICEs at -O3
- References: <20031015232442.12630.danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12630
------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2003-10-20 22:29 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] Various unrecognizable insns and ICEs at -O3
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12630
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2003-10-20 22:06 -------
> Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] Various unrecognizable
>
> > > Switching from match_dup to match_scratch introduced a need for two
> > additional
> > > temporaries. We only have one register in the class R1_REGS.
> >
> > Why these two temporaries are needed?
> > R1_REGS has constraint 'a' that is not used in the pattern at all so why
> > reload chooses to use it?
>
> I don't know. The PA backend only uses class R1_REGS for two very specific
> situations and this isn't one of them.
Do you have any idea how can I reproduce it w/o PA machine?
(don't know much about Ada...)
Honza
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.