This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/12614] [3.3 regression] Can't bootstrap without gnatmake
- From: "jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Oct 2003 20:10:26 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12614] [3.3 regression] Can't bootstrap without gnatmake
- References: <20031014131549.12614.schwab@suse.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12614
------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2003-10-14 20:10 -------
Subject: Re: New: [3.3 regression] Can't bootstrap
without gnatmake
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> The following change has introduced a bootstrap dependency on gnatmake:
>
> 2002-05-31 Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
>
> * Makefile.in, Make-lang.in: Documentation is now built in
> Make-lang.in. Store Info and generated Texinfo files in the
> source directory.
>
> When bootstrapping from scratch there is no gnatmake, only gnat1 and gnatbind.
As the generated Texinfo files are in CVS, I'd hope that only a minor
adjustment of dependencies is needed.
As for the bootstrap requirements, we're still waiting for the collection
of bootstrap compilers (say GCC 3.3.x with Ada support) for various
systems (not just those commerically supported by ACT, but any for which
people contribute such compilers) that was promised to be hosted at "the
libre site" a long time ago.
If general cross-compiler building, including Canadian crosses and
cross-building native compilers, doesn't work properly with the Ada front
end and library, following the usual (alas undocumented) procedures,
that's simply another ordinary bug.