This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/12552] Problem with increment operator gcc/g++
- From: "devnull at frogshit dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Oct 2003 16:40:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/12552] Problem with increment operator gcc/g++
- References: <20031009162745.12552.devnull@frogshit.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12552
devnull at frogshit dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
------- Additional Comments From devnull at frogshit dot com 2003-10-09 16:40 -------
I don't know what invalid code means. The code is syntactically
correct, but one gets different semantics depending on whether
the compiler does or does not optimize. It seems reasonable
to expect the same output regardless of the level of optimization.