This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/12324] [3.4 Regression] [unti-at-a-time] not emitting function referenced from a compound statement
- From: "bernie at develer dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Sep 2003 16:29:57 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/12324] [3.4 Regression] [unti-at-a-time] not emitting function referenced from a compound statement
- References: <20030918042646.12324.bernie@develer.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324
------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2003-09-26 16:29 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] [unti-at-a-time] not
emitting function referenced from a compound statement
hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
>>------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2003-09-25 20:48 -------
>>Not sure if it's the same bug, but 3.4 outputs
>>nothing for this code with -O2:
>>
>> static int foo __attribute__((unused)) = 42;
>>
>>This breaks the Linux kernel (the __setup() macro).
>>GCC 3.3.1 did the right thing:
>>
>> .data
>> .align 4
>> .type foo, @object
>> .size foo, 4
>>foo:
>> .long 42
>
> You shall use attribute used here. Attribute unused merely supress the
> warning, while attribute used makes it to be output.
Yes, I tried and it works. The documentation does not mention attribute
used for variables. I think it should be fixed.
> I will look into the other problem.
Thanks. That one also breaks the Linux kernel (drivers/net/fec.c uses
an idiom similar to the test case).
> Note that attribute used did not work for variables for older GCC, so
> you need ifdef machinery.
Do you know the exact GCC version that introduced it? I'd like to provide
a patch for the kernel. I can only confirm that 'used' works in 3.3.1 for
variables.