This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug optimization/12324] [3.4 Regression] [unti-at-a-time] not emitting function referenced from a compound statement


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324



------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2003-09-25 20:48 -------
Not sure if it's the same bug, but 3.4 outputs
nothing for this code with -O2:

  static int foo __attribute__((unused)) = 42;

This breaks the Linux kernel (the __setup() macro).
GCC 3.3.1 did the right thing:

        .data
        .align 4
        .type   foo, @object
        .size   foo, 4
foo:
        .long   42


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]