This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/12320] [3.4 Regression] ICE on use of undefined enum
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Sep 2003 01:39:08 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/12320] [3.4 Regression] ICE on use of undefined enum
- References: <20030917221512.12320.dannysmith@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12320
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2003-09-18 01:39 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] ICE on use of undefined enum
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:19, dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12320
That patch is OK, if it passes tests, which is almost certainly will.