This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/10392] [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing
- From: "marcus at mc dot pp dot se" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Sep 2003 21:13:56 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/10392] [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing
- References: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10392
------- Additional Comments From marcus at mc dot pp dot se 2003-09-13 21:13 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing
What I don't get is why the testcase shouldn't include stuff that's
part of the C standard. Several other testcases already do. In
gcc.dg alone I count to 61 of them.