This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug optimization/11319] [3.3/3.4 regression] loop miscompiled on ppc32


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11319


wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-11 00:59 -------
I have now run SPEC on a PowerMac G5.  The only noticable performance change I
see is a 3% improvement in mesa with my patches, but 3% is small enough that it
could be within my measurement error.

David Edelsohn has agreed that my patches did not introduce performance
regressions.  See
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg00377.html

So I am not closing this problem report.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]