This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/12237] New: wrong code generated due to wrong static evaluation of a signed/unsigned comparison
- From: "philippe dot coucaud at antevista dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Sep 2003 10:38:58 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/12237] New: wrong code generated due to wrong static evaluation of a signed/unsigned comparison
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12237
Summary: wrong code generated due to wrong static evaluation of a
signed/unsigned comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 3.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: philippe dot coucaud at antevista dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
The following program contains a comparison of an expression with 0 (j-k < 0).
The compiler assumes this expression is unsigned and thus cannot be negative
(the then branch is thus removed and f() always print "false"). But as j is
signed, (j-k) should be signed too and f() should print "true".
$ gcc t.c
$ ./a.exe
f(7) (j-k)=-1 -> false
----------------------------
void f(unsigned int k){
int j = k - 1;
printf("f(%i) (j-k)=%i -> ",k,j-k);
if( (j-k) < 0)
printf("true\n");
else
printf("false\n");
}
int main(){
f(7);
return 0;
}
----------------------------
adding option -W exhibits the wrong assumption on (j-k) and maybe the location
of the error (this message is generated in function shorten_compare, in file
c-common.c):
$ gcc t.c -W
t.c: In function `f':
t.c:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false