This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted
- From: "d dot frey at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Sep 2003 23:19:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted
- References: <20030628090748.11357.d.frey@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11357
------- Additional Comments From d dot frey at gmx dot de 2003-09-09 23:19 -------
Subject: Re: no conversion of build-in binary operator
argument attempted
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 06:29, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Note on the mainline, GCC accepts this one. Any news on the DR?
Not yet. I asked Daveed Vandervoorde, he told me that the DR was opened
and will be published with the next cycle. I'll keep an eye on it and
report any progress, but this will most likely not happen before
November. Since than, the GCC is not to blame for any behaviour as both
ways are... !wrong :)