This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/12221] fstream.tcc:463: error: expected unqualified-id
- From: "alexander dot riesen at synopsys dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Sep 2003 14:14:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/12221] fstream.tcc:463: error: expected unqualified-id
- References: <20030909095340.12221.alexander.riesen@synopsys.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12221
------- Additional Comments From alexander dot riesen at synopsys dot com 2003-09-09 14:14 -------
Subject: Re: fstream.tcc:463: error: expected unqualified-id
bangerth at dealii dot org, Tue, Sep 09, 2003 16:10:58 +0200:
> Just as Gaby said. You can always place the #undef in your own files,
> in front of the #include. It's not the libraries task to clean up
> macro names.
That's what I did. I'd like to get rid of the offending definition as well,
it's just kind of tricky to find in the maze of headers.