This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/10160] [3.3/3.4 regression] compile time regression; inordinate time spent in "scheduling"
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 4 Sep 2003 10:17:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/10160] [3.3/3.4 regression] compile time regression; inordinate time spent in "scheduling"
- References: <20030320051600.10160.china@thewrittenword.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10160
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-04 10:17 -------
With all the changes in the tree-inliner (and in particular with the call graph
code) since March, the information in this bug report is obsolete. This PR
really needs testing and reconfirmation if the problem still exists. Can
someone test this please?
I've marked this PR as WAITING for feedback, so that we can close it if no-one
will test this in the next three months or so.