This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/12150] [3.3/3.4 regression] warning in dead code (comparison is always false) [regression]


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12150



------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-09-03 16:40 -------
>From a user perspective, it's certainly irrelevant where exactly the warning comes from. 
I understand that it will be hard to fix this, though. 
 
What exactly is the reason that older compilers didn't warn? Did the just not notice 
the condition, or did they have a way to figure out that this was dead code? 
 
W.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]