This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/10093] Regression: Setting failbit in exceptions doesn't work
- From: "peturr02 at ru dot is" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Sep 2003 08:17:18 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/10093] Regression: Setting failbit in exceptions doesn't work
- References: <20030315103601.10093.peturr02@ru.is>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
------- Additional Comments From peturr02 at ru dot is 2003-09-03 08:17 -------
I don't know how I managed to miss this:
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#61
This means that exceptions thrown by setstate() should not be caught.
So this bug is real, and is a regression.
This still leaves open what to do in sentry::sentry(), but that's not
really relevant to this bug, and is the subject of another DR:
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#309