This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11928] [3.3/3.4 regression] c++ typedef handling
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Aug 2003 14:10:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11928] [3.3/3.4 regression] c++ typedef handling
- References: <20030815134929.11928.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Priority|P2 |P1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-15 14:10:28
date| |
Summary|c++ typedef handling |[3.3/3.4 regression] c++
| |typedef handling
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-15 14:10 -------
I don't have 3.3.1 lying around on this machine, but I can confirm that
a) this problem doesn't happen in 3.3.0
b) doesn't happen with a mainline snapshot from mainline
c) does happen with this night's mainline
You specified as the version you have "3.3.3", which I doubt since we only just
released 3.3.1. Can you double-check?
I wonder whether this PR is related to PR 11919 which also has problems with
typedefs not being equivalents for types.
W.