[Bug bootstrap/11909] gcc-3.3 build error; build fail

["will dot washington at epiphany dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11909



------- Additional Comments From will dot washington at epiphany dot com  2003-08-14 22:10 -------
Subject: RE:  gcc-3.3 build error; build fail

I'm not sure I understand the actual procedure to fix this; I used a
local gcc-2.9.53 to compile; can you explain in more detail where the
header file would be.

-----Original Message-----
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Will Washington
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/11909] gcc-3.3 build error; build fail

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11909


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-13 23:21 -------
This is not a bug in GCC.  The problem is that AIX 5.2 adds support for
atoll(), but the cached copy of stdlib.h from AIX 5.1 and earlier do not
have a 
prototype, so the return argument is interpreted incorrectly.  The fix
is to

remove the "fixed" header file from the GCC cache of the version of GCC
used
to 
bootstrap on AIX 5.2.

This is also a dup of bug 9382.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 9382 ***



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.