This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments
- From: "falk at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Aug 2003 20:07:45 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments
- References: <20030811192658.11884.sdowning@fame.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-08-11 20:07 -------
The differing address doesn't seem like a bug per se to me; gcc might spill it,
reclaim it, and then re-spill to a different place, although that seems unlikely.
So is there any observable wrong behaviour?