[Bug optimization/11841] [3.3 Regression] The code compiled with -funroll-loops crashes

["s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11841



------- Additional Comments From s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl  2003-08-07 13:42 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3 Regression] The code compiled
	with -funroll-loops crashes

Op do 07-08-2003, om 15:36 schreef bangerth at dealii dot org:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11841
> 
> 
> bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
>                    |                            |org
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-08-07 13:36 -------
> I added you to the list of CCs, that's how you got there. I'll add
> you again this time just to make sure you get this mail, but
> feel free to remove yourself again :-)
> 
> Regarding the confirmation of a PR-- You did this in this message:
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-08/msg00996.html
> This doesn't conform with our policies of only changing the state
> of a PR upon confirmation if and when a reduced testcase is
> available. There is none for this PR. That's why I objected.
> 
> Besides: this definitely is not a fortran bug. Did you by accident
> pick the wrong PR?

I think I know what happened.  I picked up a gfortran bug, and then
wanted to confirm it -- but unlike GNATS, Bugzilla moves to the next bug
in the list when you commit something.  So while I thought I confirmed
the gfortran bug, I actually confirmed this PR by accident.  Sorry about
that.