This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/11829] nanl problem
- From: "schwab at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Aug 2003 13:23:19 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/11829] nanl problem
- References: <20030806092140.11829.marksni@delvron.us>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11829
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2003-08-06 13:23 -------
I cannot find any requirement in the C standard that the argument of nan must
be non-NULL. There is not even a requirement that the argument must be a
string when non-NULL, but that looks like a defect in the standard.