[Bug optimization/9767] explicit instantiation of class members unoptimized?

["jh at suse dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9767



------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz  2003-07-30 15:00 -------
Subject: Re:  explicit instantiation of class members unoptimized?

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9767
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-29 22:15 -------
> It is fixed with -funit-at-a-time in c++. Should we close this, now it is fixed with -funit-at-a-
> time?

I would guess so.  Or you can assign it to me and we can wait until
-funit-at-a-time become default in case this won't take forever.

Honza
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.