[Bug target/11699] internal compiler error, unrecognized instruction.

["cgd at broadcom dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11699



------- Additional Comments From cgd at broadcom dot com  2003-07-29 17:49 -------
Subject: Re:  internal compiler error, unrecognized
 instruction.

At 29 Jul 2003 17:43:46 -0000, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu wrote:
> Since the option -mexplicit-relocs did not exist before 3.4, this is not a regression.

Let me try to spin this my way.  8-)


Consider the args:

        -G0 -mabicalls pr11699.c

gcc 3.3 + stock binutils of approximately same vintage:

        works fine as far as i know.  I've not tested it, but I've
        never seen problems like this before...

CVS gcc + CVS binutils of same vintage:

        crashes.

no "-mexplicit-relocs" options is needed in the latter case, because
-mexplicit-relocs is the *default*.


I.e., compiling this test program with "-G0 -mabicalls" on top of the
built-in defaults used to work, and now does not.

So, regression.


On simple solution to the regression would be to disable
-mexplicit-relocs by default, but that would seriously bite.  8-)


(I can provide you the scripts that i use to checkout and combine, if
that'd help you demonstrate to your satisfaction.)



chris