This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Jul 2003 12:01:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
- References: <20030729060307.11703.snyder@fnal.gov>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Priority|P2 |P1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-07-29 12:01:04
date| |
Summary|Problem with using enum in |[3.4 Regression] Problem
|placement delete |with using enum in placement
| |delete
Target Milestone|--- |3.4
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-29 12:01 -------
I can confirm this on i686-pc-linux-gnu on the mainline (20030729, Tue Jul 29 04:16:44
UTC 2003) but on powerpc-apple-darwin6.3 (where I had to change size_t to be a
unsigned long), it does not fail for some reason.
And it does not fail in 20030728 so this is a regression.