This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/11669] [3.4 regression] Calling of static functions does not work (build of glibc broken)


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11669



------- Additional Comments From mec at shout dot net  2003-07-26 16:17 -------
This happens to me on native i686-pc-linux-gnu with -gstabs+ with the following
source file:

  static void f1 ();
  static void f1 () { return; }
  static void f2 () { return; }

f1 is getting qualified as "f1.0".  f2 is not getting qualified, which is right.
 This causes gdb to not find the symbol "f1" with -gstabs+ debugging format.

I started a date search.  The bug did not happen with gcc HEAD from 2003-07-19
15:00:00 UTC, and it did happen with gcc HEAD from 2003-07-22 02:00:00 UTC.

Geoff K says it is fixed now and I am building a current compiler to try it out.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]