This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/11669] [3.4 regression] Calling of static functions does not work (build of glibc broken)
- From: "mec at shout dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Jul 2003 16:17:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/11669] [3.4 regression] Calling of static functions does not work (build of glibc broken)
- References: <20030725091122.11669.aj@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
------- Additional Comments From mec at shout dot net 2003-07-26 16:17 -------
This happens to me on native i686-pc-linux-gnu with -gstabs+ with the following
source file:
static void f1 ();
static void f1 () { return; }
static void f2 () { return; }
f1 is getting qualified as "f1.0". f2 is not getting qualified, which is right.
This causes gdb to not find the symbol "f1" with -gstabs+ debugging format.
I started a date search. The bug did not happen with gcc HEAD from 2003-07-19
15:00:00 UTC, and it did happen with gcc HEAD from 2003-07-22 02:00:00 UTC.
Geoff K says it is fixed now and I am building a current compiler to try it out.